Here’s an instructional video by cobbler where he shows you how to make a simple image stabilizer for your camera in less than 5 minutes using a string, a bolt and a washer. It only costs around $1 in materials and can fit in your pocket, eliminating the need to carry around a monopod or tripod in some situations.

via Daring Fireball


filed under Photography

 

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

{ 6 comments… read them below or add one }

terry chay January 30, 2008 at 11:33 am

Hehe, a poor man’s strap pod. Nice.

http://www.kirkphoto.com/accessories.html#strappod

(I use Arca Swiss brackets so this is out of the question.)

Jim Goldstein January 30, 2008 at 11:38 am

This would not replace the need for a tripod. At best it might be an alternative to a monopod, but even then not recommended.

With Image Stabilization or Vibration Reduction lenses you can avoid the need to do this and in the process look a bit more together when in public.

Then again if you like being MacGyver…

Here’s why this approach doesn’t help…
1. at a slow enough shutter speed even your breathing or pulse can move the camera.
2. if you’re shooting slow shutter speeds then this solution is completely irrelevant.
3. although this addresses horizontal and vertical movement it does not address rotational movement of the camera. If you’re hand is tired and your lens dips forward or backwards you still get movement.

Regarding my monopod reference… monopods are designed to give people the ability to lean forwards, backwards, sidways and pan all while holding the weight of the lens/camera. Mostly monopods and tripods alike are used to alleviate the weight of your gear… getting the shakes from holding heavier gear seldom allows you to capture sharp images and if you’re looking to capture long exposures at night this isn’t even in the realm of possibilities to use.

Eric Skiff January 30, 2008 at 11:42 am

Definitely interesting – I love how cheap and portable it is, I’ll give it a shot. Thanks for linking it up here :)

Dave Conrey January 30, 2008 at 2:01 pm

That’s Freakin’ Brilliant. Thanks for that tip!

Ray January 30, 2008 at 3:53 pm

I’m a travel writer and photographer, fulltime, and anything that makes the backpack lighter is a blessing. This is a great idea and would help in many (but not all) situations. In places where theft is a problem, this would be ideal for reducing camera shake, but as Mr. Goldstein rightly points out, it can’t replace a tripod. If one is taking bird photos at dusk with a 600mm lens, most photographers will opt for a tripod. On the other hand, Cobbler’s device should not be discounted as “MacGyver,” and he makes it clear that it is primarily for image stablilization — eliminating the need for expensive lenses. I’ve used trees, cars, the camera strap, and other things to reduce blur or shake (and have a very steady hand — I’ve taken clear, crisp shots at 1/4th of a second, which most photographers will agree is hard to do), and at times I’ve needed a tiny, ultraportable device like this. Kudos to Cobbler for sharing a great idea in a clear, easy to understand manner. I’ve yet to try it, but will keep it in mind for my next trip.

Ryan February 15, 2008 at 6:25 pm

Brilliant! High-five from one Eagle to another!

Previous post:

Next post: