<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows Experience Index for Acer Ferrari 1000</title>
	<atom:link href="http://laughingsquid.com/windows-experience-index-for-acer-ferrari-1000/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://laughingsquid.com/windows-experience-index-for-acer-ferrari-1000/</link>
	<description>art, culture and technology from San Francisco and beyond</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 02:11:18 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Finnegan Murphy</title>
		<link>http://laughingsquid.com/windows-experience-index-for-acer-ferrari-1000/comment-page-1/#comment-525845</link>
		<dc:creator>Finnegan Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 16:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laughingsquid.com/windows-experience-index-for-acer-ferrari-1000/#comment-525845</guid>
		<description>Both of these ratings sound right for you specs

You have a 2.8 because your laptop has a low end graphics card (ATI Radeon Xpress 200M). You could consider upgrading if you are a gamer, otherwise it is not a big deal. Bugalugs 4.7 is not surprising for his processor, although you could try running the test with all applications closed including sidebar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both of these ratings sound right for you specs</p>
<p>You have a 2.8 because your laptop has a low end graphics card (ATI Radeon Xpress 200M). You could consider upgrading if you are a gamer, otherwise it is not a big deal. Bugalugs 4.7 is not surprising for his processor, although you could try running the test with all applications closed including sidebar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://laughingsquid.com/windows-experience-index-for-acer-ferrari-1000/comment-page-1/#comment-283380</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 12:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laughingsquid.com/windows-experience-index-for-acer-ferrari-1000/#comment-283380</guid>
		<description>This comment is for  BugAlugs
either your bios settings are completely incorrect or you have a really bad motherboard cpu combo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This comment is for  BugAlugs<br />
either your bios settings are completely incorrect or you have a really bad motherboard cpu combo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iqbal</title>
		<link>http://laughingsquid.com/windows-experience-index-for-acer-ferrari-1000/comment-page-1/#comment-176988</link>
		<dc:creator>iqbal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 04:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laughingsquid.com/windows-experience-index-for-acer-ferrari-1000/#comment-176988</guid>
		<description>i think the graphic card driver and stuff should be updated to get higher score and higher performencer. i believe ATI radeon x1150 in acer ferrari can do much better than 2.8 since my ATI 200m can score 3.1 after i updated the graphic card driver with ATI latest driver release. i really love to see the score for ferrari 1000 after the graphic card be updated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think the graphic card driver and stuff should be updated to get higher score and higher performencer. i believe ATI radeon x1150 in acer ferrari can do much better than 2.8 since my ATI 200m can score 3.1 after i updated the graphic card driver with ATI latest driver release. i really love to see the score for ferrari 1000 after the graphic card be updated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BugAlugs</title>
		<link>http://laughingsquid.com/windows-experience-index-for-acer-ferrari-1000/comment-page-1/#comment-112783</link>
		<dc:creator>BugAlugs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 10:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laughingsquid.com/windows-experience-index-for-acer-ferrari-1000/#comment-112783</guid>
		<description>My PC is quite nice but a Windows Experience Index of ONLY 4.7 !

Processor - 4.7
RAM - 5.9
Graphics - 5.9
Gaming Graphics - 5.9
Primay Hard disk - 5.7

So why is my CPU so slow?
The new dual core E6600 should be hitting 5.4 according to forums/sites/pundits and the like
I&#039;ve been into BIOS and Vista settings, I&#039;ve made sure that no CPU throttling is occuring.
My only other though is that i&#039;m running the 64bit version.

Does anyone know if the 64bit version puts a different requirement on the CPU/Pocessor test ?

Some example stats

My Rig

E6600 4 MB L2 2.40 GHz 1066 MHz - WEI RATING 4.7
Vista Ultimate - 64 bit

  85.94229 
  48.20735 
  229.75929 
  394.35495 
  9.83065 


Friends Rig
Dell XPS Laptop

T7400 4 MB L2 2.16 GHz 667 MHz - WEI RATING 5.4
Vista Home Premium - 32 bit
- 
  110.64363 
  56.51694 
  312.99292 
  510.65292 
  6.92793

Any thoughts on this would be great

BugAlugs</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My PC is quite nice but a Windows Experience Index of ONLY 4.7 !</p>
<p>Processor &#8211; 4.7<br />
RAM &#8211; 5.9<br />
Graphics &#8211; 5.9<br />
Gaming Graphics &#8211; 5.9<br />
Primay Hard disk &#8211; 5.7</p>
<p>So why is my CPU so slow?<br />
The new dual core E6600 should be hitting 5.4 according to forums/sites/pundits and the like<br />
I&#8217;ve been into BIOS and Vista settings, I&#8217;ve made sure that no CPU throttling is occuring.<br />
My only other though is that i&#8217;m running the 64bit version.</p>
<p>Does anyone know if the 64bit version puts a different requirement on the CPU/Pocessor test ?</p>
<p>Some example stats</p>
<p>My Rig</p>
<p>E6600 4 MB L2 2.40 GHz 1066 MHz &#8211; WEI RATING 4.7<br />
Vista Ultimate &#8211; 64 bit</p>
<p>  85.94229<br />
  48.20735<br />
  229.75929<br />
  394.35495<br />
  9.83065 </p>
<p>Friends Rig<br />
Dell XPS Laptop</p>
<p>T7400 4 MB L2 2.16 GHz 667 MHz &#8211; WEI RATING 5.4<br />
Vista Home Premium &#8211; 32 bit<br />
-<br />
  110.64363<br />
  56.51694<br />
  312.99292<br />
  510.65292<br />
  6.92793</p>
<p>Any thoughts on this would be great</p>
<p>BugAlugs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laughing Squid &#187; Microsoft Sent A Free Laptop With Windows Vista</title>
		<link>http://laughingsquid.com/windows-experience-index-for-acer-ferrari-1000/comment-page-1/#comment-76965</link>
		<dc:creator>Laughing Squid &#187; Microsoft Sent A Free Laptop With Windows Vista</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 23:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laughingsquid.com/windows-experience-index-for-acer-ferrari-1000/#comment-76965</guid>
		<description>[...] UPDATE 9: I did a follow-up post about the low Windows Experience Index score for Acer Ferrari 1000. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] UPDATE 9: I did a follow-up post about the low Windows Experience Index score for Acer Ferrari 1000. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
