Steve Rotman, ROME

Steve Rotman as shot by Troy Holden

A few weeks ago, photographer Steve Rotman released “San Francisco Street Art”,  bringing to life The Bay Area’s vibrant underground art world. Rotman has been working obsessively for almost five years on this latest project, which takes you on an oft not seen side of San Francisco’s back alleys, “chill spots”, and grimier neighborhood walls and sidewalks. The official book-release is Monday, May 11th at Books Inc. Opera Plaza on Van Ness Street in San Francisco, where several of the featured artists will be available to talk about their work.

I recently sat down with Steve and talked about his new book, and the politics of San Francisco graffiti…

Troy Holden: San Francisco City officials claim graffiti complaints are way up this year. They claim The City is overwhelmed with graffiti removal requests from private citizens and business owners. Is there really more graffiti now than there was five years ago?

Steve: No, not even close! In fact, San Francisco’s never been more graffiti-free, thanks to several years of aggressive buffing. Just a few years ago, graffiti was ubiquitous: there were big colorful rooftop pieces in almost every neighborhood, parking lots were layered with years of history, business roll-down gates featured a steady rotation of throw-ups, there were doors crushed with tags citywide, and several Muni tunnels were painted end to end. Almost none of that exists anymore. The amount of graffiti today is exponentially less. It raises an obvious question: what’s all the fuss about?

Troy Holden: To address these concerns, City Officials recently held an Anti-Graffiti “Super Huddle” with the lofty goal of eliminating all graffiti in The City once and for all. Is that realistic? If these proposed enforcement/abatement efforts take effect, will there be anything left for you to photograph?

Steve: Gosh, let’s hope so, otherwise I’ll have to find a new hobby! No, seriously, the idea of “Zero Graffiti” is just silly. Graffiti has been a vital part of San Francisco for more than three decades. Even with the aggressive buffing over the last few years, there’s still plenty of good graffiti here and I expect there will be for a long time to come.

Disobey

“Disobey” as shot by Steve Rotman

Troy Holden: City officials say all we need to know about graffiti is that it’s illegal and it’s vandalism. What do you think?

Steve: That’s simplistic. Graffiti is obviously much more than criminal. It’s a worldwide renegade art culture that’s been around for decades. Graffiti is routinely exhibited in museums and art galleries all over the world. Bookstores feature shelves full of graffiti and street art collections. Graffiti festivals are commonplace. Graffiti-inspired designs infuse popular culture. Why? Because people enjoy it!

Troy Holden: City authorities insist a lot of graffiti is created by gangbangers and thugs. You’ve spent a lot of time around graffiti and graffiti artists. What do you think of this nonsense?

Steve: Look, I’ve heard this propaganda about graffiti and gangs for a long time. It’s comical. It’s basically a way to scare the public and vilify graffiti. I’ve come to know the local graffiti culture very well. I’ve yet to meet a single graffiti writer who strikes me as gang affiliated. Graffiti writers love graffiti and art. They’re into creating art on the streets. Their passion is graffiti, not gangbanging.

Defie

“Defie” as shot by Steve Rotman

Troy Holden: This year you and collaborator Chris Brennan put out two books: Bay Area Graffiti and now San Francisco Street Art. Why two books? How is street art different from graffiti?

Steve: That’s a great question. It’s easy to get the two confused because both categories are usually illegal. I see them as two different varieties of urban expression. Graffiti is about stylistically and competitively “getting up”– writing a name over and over, usually with spray paint or markers. It mainly involves creation of stylized letter forms through tags, throw-ups, and pieces. Street art is more about creating a message or imagery through stencils, stickers, wheat-pastes or murals. For outsiders, graffiti tends to look more alien because the letters can be tough to read. Street art is more accessible. That said, there’s definitely some crossover between the two.

Troy Holden: Some people see tagging as “scrawls and scribbles.” You also shoot photos of tags. Why?

Steve: I like tags. I’ve learned that they’re a key element of graffiti and I appreciate tagging as a form of urban calligraphy. Well crafted tags reflect individual style. To create a really impressive tag requires great skill and technique.

Pose2

“Pose 2″ as shot by Steve Rotman

Troy Holden: What are some good locations to get a taste of the urban art you’ve been documenting in San Francisco?

Steve: Just for starters, I’d suggest Clarion Alley between Valencia and Mission streets. Also in the Mission, Lilac Alley between 24th and 26th streets. In the Soma district, Bluxome Alley at roughly 430 Townsend street. And in the Upper Haight, check out the Amoeba Records parking lot.

Troy Holden: Word up, thanks Steve.


filed under Art, Photography, San Francisco

 

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

{ 4 comments… read them below or add one }

Coty May 10, 2009 at 11:07 pm

Great interview. I’ve always been intrigued by street art & graffiti so this really caught my attention. Now I’m gonna check out the book!

Lee May 11, 2009 at 2:15 pm

Marking another person’s property without their permission is anti-social,
ugly, and a crime.

Marking another person’s property with their permission has
the ability to be art. Every example you cited, Clarion Alley et all all had
permission.

The amount of graffiti today is exponentially less. It raises an obvious
question: what’s all the fuss about?

Ask that question to the hundreds of people in San Francisco that had to
clean up these “artists” shit in the past week, replacing $1,000 windows,
spending hours scrubbing with toxic chemicals and renting steamers and
blasters.

Sarah June 4, 2009 at 4:34 pm

hey I just got Steve’s book, San Francisco Street Art. And I noticed he had one artist, unkonown to him, on the oppisite page of the intro, the green geisha, page 10, 11, 27, 63, and the back cover. The artist is BURNER. I don’t know much about him, excet that he does a lot of different styles and wirtes too. But I do know all those pagesa re his art. I just thought someone should know that for the next book.
Great pictures. Could you give this info to Steve, this seemed to be the only real link to find him.

Sarah

Criminal September 1, 2009 at 11:02 am

Lee:
I suppose you’d rather have corporations impose their consumerist vision of society through advertising than people expressing themselves in public space? I consider wealthy conglomerates’ frantic urgings for free citizens to take on excessive debt and buy useless material items uglier than colorful and emotive art done by real ordinary people for no profit or recognition. If you don’t like graffiti, move to the suburbs; street art is a part of urban culture and a response to the property- and commerce-centric worldview so close-mindedly illustrated by your comment. You missed the point my friend and I wonder why you choose to live in SF with that attitude; perhaps Texas would be more to your tastes…

Previous post:

Next post: