<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OpenDNS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://laughingsquid.com/opendns/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://laughingsquid.com/opendns/</link>
	<description>art, culture and technology from San Francisco and beyond</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 18:18:06 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Couzens</title>
		<link>http://laughingsquid.com/opendns/comment-page-1/#comment-525902</link>
		<dc:creator>David Couzens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 13:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laughingsquid.com/2006/07/18/opendns/#comment-525902</guid>
		<description>Hi All,

Ive rolled out OpenDNS to a lot of my customers but today I had a very strange message that appeared stating no webpages I surfed to can be found.

the bottom message was a squid error but i dont run squid

Do opendns run squid?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi All,</p>
<p>Ive rolled out OpenDNS to a lot of my customers but today I had a very strange message that appeared stating no webpages I surfed to can be found.</p>
<p>the bottom message was a squid error but i dont run squid</p>
<p>Do opendns run squid?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve garfield</title>
		<link>http://laughingsquid.com/opendns/comment-page-1/#comment-525081</link>
		<dc:creator>steve garfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 14:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laughingsquid.com/2006/07/18/opendns/#comment-525081</guid>
		<description>I have Comcast in Boston.

Old:
15,067
2,395

New:
29,813
2,713</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have Comcast in Boston.</p>
<p>Old:<br />
15,067<br />
2,395</p>
<p>New:<br />
29,813<br />
2,713</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Hoppe</title>
		<link>http://laughingsquid.com/opendns/comment-page-1/#comment-524773</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Hoppe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 19:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laughingsquid.com/2006/07/18/opendns/#comment-524773</guid>
		<description>I work for the Menlo Park City School district.  We recently were experiencing very slow external DNS lookups.  I stumbled across OpenDNS, added their DNS servers to the forwarders list of our DNS servers (removed all others), and BAM!  External name resolution is almost as fast as internal name resolution.  It has really brought some life back to our tiny T-1 line (which is soon to be upgraded)!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I work for the Menlo Park City School district.  We recently were experiencing very slow external DNS lookups.  I stumbled across OpenDNS, added their DNS servers to the forwarders list of our DNS servers (removed all others), and BAM!  External name resolution is almost as fast as internal name resolution.  It has really brought some life back to our tiny T-1 line (which is soon to be upgraded)!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://laughingsquid.com/opendns/comment-page-1/#comment-297401</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 06:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laughingsquid.com/2006/07/18/opendns/#comment-297401</guid>
		<description>I have actually noticed a decrease in speed. I have Qwest in Phoenix, AZ. I don&#039;t see any reason to run OpenDNS any longer. Firefox delivers all the same features that I would use.  Keywords, typo correction, and phishing protection. I have no use for domain blocking at home.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have actually noticed a decrease in speed. I have Qwest in Phoenix, AZ. I don&#8217;t see any reason to run OpenDNS any longer. Firefox delivers all the same features that I would use.  Keywords, typo correction, and phishing protection. I have no use for domain blocking at home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Esa Loyva</title>
		<link>http://laughingsquid.com/opendns/comment-page-1/#comment-269246</link>
		<dc:creator>Esa Loyva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 23:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laughingsquid.com/2006/07/18/opendns/#comment-269246</guid>
		<description>I thought I was going nuts....Firefox would time out before the page started to load,  even my emails would sometimes not send before Outlook express timed out.   I&#039;m with Telus in BC Canada.  A friend told me about the problem dns servers ( he works for Telus as an ADSL  service person.)  Changed to Open DSN and now pages open almost immediately instead of 30 to 40 secs.
Works great
Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought I was going nuts&#8230;.Firefox would time out before the page started to load,  even my emails would sometimes not send before Outlook express timed out.   I&#8217;m with Telus in BC Canada.  A friend told me about the problem dns servers ( he works for Telus as an ADSL  service person.)  Changed to Open DSN and now pages open almost immediately instead of 30 to 40 secs.<br />
Works great<br />
Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Ulevitch</title>
		<link>http://laughingsquid.com/opendns/comment-page-1/#comment-234159</link>
		<dc:creator>David Ulevitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 00:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laughingsquid.com/2006/07/18/opendns/#comment-234159</guid>
		<description>Hi Nabeel,

Thanks for letting us know.  If you&#039;d email me a traceroute to the IPs you&#039;re using that&#039;d help me a lot.

I&#039;m david [atatat] opendns [dotdotdot] com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Nabeel,</p>
<p>Thanks for letting us know.  If you&#8217;d email me a traceroute to the IPs you&#8217;re using that&#8217;d help me a lot.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m david [atatat] opendns [dotdotdot] com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nabeel</title>
		<link>http://laughingsquid.com/opendns/comment-page-1/#comment-233551</link>
		<dc:creator>Nabeel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 15:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laughingsquid.com/2006/07/18/opendns/#comment-233551</guid>
		<description>I agree with DP, I&#039;m also Optimum Online in westchester, lookups seem slower.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with DP, I&#8217;m also Optimum Online in westchester, lookups seem slower.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Carter</title>
		<link>http://laughingsquid.com/opendns/comment-page-1/#comment-66185</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Carter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 11:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laughingsquid.com/2006/07/18/opendns/#comment-66185</guid>
		<description>I am using an iMac with Charter Broadband. During peak hours my internet connection was incredibly slow, but with OpenDns, it runs about 5 times faster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am using an iMac with Charter Broadband. During peak hours my internet connection was incredibly slow, but with OpenDns, it runs about 5 times faster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hylas Ipsum</title>
		<link>http://laughingsquid.com/opendns/comment-page-1/#comment-26030</link>
		<dc:creator>Hylas Ipsum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 19:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laughingsquid.com/2006/07/18/opendns/#comment-26030</guid>
		<description>No worries here, Comcast is our provider and we went to OpenDNS the first day for our business connections (we host our sites here at the laughingsquid).
Nothing but BlueSky.
Trust? You &quot;trust&quot; Comcast? Man are you in for a suprise. They&#039;re screwed, blued and tattooed by the tier 1 SysAdmins they use, I&#039;ve been looking for a way out for years.
We&#039;ll see how this pans out, so far so good.
Hylas</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No worries here, Comcast is our provider and we went to OpenDNS the first day for our business connections (we host our sites here at the laughingsquid).<br />
Nothing but BlueSky.<br />
Trust? You &#8220;trust&#8221; Comcast? Man are you in for a suprise. They&#8217;re screwed, blued and tattooed by the tier 1 SysAdmins they use, I&#8217;ve been looking for a way out for years.<br />
We&#8217;ll see how this pans out, so far so good.<br />
Hylas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham Freeman</title>
		<link>http://laughingsquid.com/opendns/comment-page-1/#comment-25594</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham Freeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 22:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laughingsquid.com/2006/07/18/opendns/#comment-25594</guid>
		<description>I set up my in-laws in British Columbia with OpenDNS, and we saw an immediate and very noticeable improvement in DNS resolution.  Telus, their DSL ISP at their home and at their Vancouver office, apparently has quite slow+unreliable recursive DNS servers.  I didn&#039;t actually measure anything, but my in-laws are happy so I&#039;m happy.  :)

Graham</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I set up my in-laws in British Columbia with OpenDNS, and we saw an immediate and very noticeable improvement in DNS resolution.  Telus, their DSL ISP at their home and at their Vancouver office, apparently has quite slow+unreliable recursive DNS servers.  I didn&#8217;t actually measure anything, but my in-laws are happy so I&#8217;m happy.  :)</p>
<p>Graham</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd D Budd</title>
		<link>http://laughingsquid.com/opendns/comment-page-1/#comment-25241</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd D Budd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 21:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laughingsquid.com/2006/07/18/opendns/#comment-25241</guid>
		<description>Hi David,

It is great if you are positioned to have a global service including local languages. Where your service would be consistently faster than a &quot;local provider&quot; would lead me to complain to the provider. I am sorry, DNS is not magic, and never been a perceived issue for me, particularly not a bottle neck.

I have experienced plenty of outages, but I guess I am lucky that it has never been isolated to DNS,
Lloyd</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi David,</p>
<p>It is great if you are positioned to have a global service including local languages. Where your service would be consistently faster than a &#8220;local provider&#8221; would lead me to complain to the provider. I am sorry, DNS is not magic, and never been a perceived issue for me, particularly not a bottle neck.</p>
<p>I have experienced plenty of outages, but I guess I am lucky that it has never been isolated to DNS,<br />
Lloyd</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Ulevitch</title>
		<link>http://laughingsquid.com/opendns/comment-page-1/#comment-24666</link>
		<dc:creator>David Ulevitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 02:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laughingsquid.com/2006/07/18/opendns/#comment-24666</guid>
		<description>Lloyd,

There&#039;s nothing about us that&#039;s US-only (except the language on our website).  Networking on the net is a funny thing where network topology and global geography don&#039;t always intersect where you think they do.

For example, it&#039;s likely that folks in Australia would have better connectivity to us in Palo Alto or LA than they would in Tokyo.  Might not make sense, but google for &quot;Southern Cross Cables&quot; and you&#039;ll start to figure it out.

Lots of areas in Africa are on Sat connections that backhaul into the US or Europe.  We&#039;re in the last steps of bringing up our POP in London which will pretty much give us the European coverage we need.  A future site at AMS-IX or similar would just add redundancy (see recent RIPE presentation at NANOG on route overlap between LINX and AMS-IX locations for K-Root).

About DNS being slow, well, of course, ymmv.  Then again, when your DNS is down, you&#039;ll know. :-)

Thanks,
David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lloyd,</p>
<p>There&#8217;s nothing about us that&#8217;s US-only (except the language on our website).  Networking on the net is a funny thing where network topology and global geography don&#8217;t always intersect where you think they do.</p>
<p>For example, it&#8217;s likely that folks in Australia would have better connectivity to us in Palo Alto or LA than they would in Tokyo.  Might not make sense, but google for &#8220;Southern Cross Cables&#8221; and you&#8217;ll start to figure it out.</p>
<p>Lots of areas in Africa are on Sat connections that backhaul into the US or Europe.  We&#8217;re in the last steps of bringing up our POP in London which will pretty much give us the European coverage we need.  A future site at AMS-IX or similar would just add redundancy (see recent RIPE presentation at NANOG on route overlap between LINX and AMS-IX locations for K-Root).</p>
<p>About DNS being slow, well, of course, ymmv.  Then again, when your DNS is down, you&#8217;ll know. :-)</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd D Budd</title>
		<link>http://laughingsquid.com/opendns/comment-page-1/#comment-24258</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd D Budd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 18:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laughingsquid.com/2006/07/18/opendns/#comment-24258</guid>
		<description>Strange Scott, I did not see your comment previously.

I did give it a try. I did not find any difference, but I never found myself thinking &quot;this DNS look up is slow&quot;. I am sure people&#039;s mileage will vary.

Today, it seems to be a US only solution.

I don&#039;t see it as competition to browsers at all, but I don&#039;t think it is currently a general or practical solution.

Though I find it intriguing, the technical details don&#039;t really add up to me either. It is not my experience that most DNS servers are slow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Strange Scott, I did not see your comment previously.</p>
<p>I did give it a try. I did not find any difference, but I never found myself thinking &#8220;this DNS look up is slow&#8221;. I am sure people&#8217;s mileage will vary.</p>
<p>Today, it seems to be a US only solution.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see it as competition to browsers at all, but I don&#8217;t think it is currently a general or practical solution.</p>
<p>Though I find it intriguing, the technical details don&#8217;t really add up to me either. It is not my experience that most DNS servers are slow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SÃ¸ren</title>
		<link>http://laughingsquid.com/opendns/comment-page-1/#comment-24242</link>
		<dc:creator>SÃ¸ren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 16:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laughingsquid.com/2006/07/18/opendns/#comment-24242</guid>
		<description>DNS lookups are &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://tongodeon.livejournal.com/500326.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;6.5x faster for me.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DNS lookups are <a HREF="http://tongodeon.livejournal.com/500326.html" rel="nofollow">6.5x faster for me.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IT Blogwatch</title>
		<link>http://laughingsquid.com/opendns/comment-page-1/#comment-24190</link>
		<dc:creator>IT Blogwatch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 10:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laughingsquid.com/2006/07/18/opendns/#comment-24190</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;OpenDNS opens for business (and Steve Jobs&#039; blog?...&lt;/strong&gt;

Namaste. This is IT Blogwatch, in which a very boring -- yet utterly vital -- part of the Internet infrastructure gets a kick in the pants. Not to mention The Secret Diary of Steve Jobs, Aged 51 1/2......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>OpenDNS opens for business (and Steve Jobs&#8217; blog?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Namaste. This is IT Blogwatch, in which a very boring &#8212; yet utterly vital &#8212; part of the Internet infrastructure gets a kick in the pants. Not to mention The Secret Diary of Steve Jobs, Aged 51 1/2&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SÃ¸ren</title>
		<link>http://laughingsquid.com/opendns/comment-page-1/#comment-24174</link>
		<dc:creator>SÃ¸ren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 05:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laughingsquid.com/2006/07/18/opendns/#comment-24174</guid>
		<description>The &quot;probably around .002 Meg down improvement&quot; comment indicates you might need to clarify what you mean by &quot;faster&quot;.  OpenDNS won&#039;t increase your internet bandwidth, but it will make web surfing *snappier*.  It will resolve domain names into IP addresses faster than letting the requests propigate.  MySpace is a particularly good test case: a lot of people hotlink images from websites all over (not to mention the ads) and there could be a few dozen domains to resolve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;probably around .002 Meg down improvement&#8221; comment indicates you might need to clarify what you mean by &#8220;faster&#8221;.  OpenDNS won&#8217;t increase your internet bandwidth, but it will make web surfing *snappier*.  It will resolve domain names into IP addresses faster than letting the requests propigate.  MySpace is a particularly good test case: a lot of people hotlink images from websites all over (not to mention the ads) and there could be a few dozen domains to resolve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd D Budd</title>
		<link>http://laughingsquid.com/opendns/comment-page-1/#comment-24094</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd D Budd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 22:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laughingsquid.com/2006/07/18/opendns/#comment-24094</guid>
		<description>Hi Steve Collins, 
Interesting. Response time relative to what? what do you enjoy about it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Steve Collins,<br />
Interesting. Response time relative to what? what do you enjoy about it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Collins</title>
		<link>http://laughingsquid.com/opendns/comment-page-1/#comment-24085</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Collins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 21:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laughingsquid.com/2006/07/18/opendns/#comment-24085</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d argue that the US-centric position put by Lloyd above doesn&#039;t hold true.  I&#039;ve switched to using OpenDNS here in Australia after reading this post.  Response time on a number of things seems hella fast.

I&#039;m with one of the bigger 2nd-tier (and VERY geek-friendly) ISPs here who generally get it all right - Internode (www.internode.on.net).  I&#039;ve never had issues with their DNS, but I think OpenDNS may be somewhat quicker, even from here.

David, how about putting a server in Australia?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d argue that the US-centric position put by Lloyd above doesn&#8217;t hold true.  I&#8217;ve switched to using OpenDNS here in Australia after reading this post.  Response time on a number of things seems hella fast.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m with one of the bigger 2nd-tier (and VERY geek-friendly) ISPs here who generally get it all right &#8211; Internode (www.internode.on.net).  I&#8217;ve never had issues with their DNS, but I think OpenDNS may be somewhat quicker, even from here.</p>
<p>David, how about putting a server in Australia?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Ulevitch</title>
		<link>http://laughingsquid.com/opendns/comment-page-1/#comment-24077</link>
		<dc:creator>David Ulevitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 20:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laughingsquid.com/2006/07/18/opendns/#comment-24077</guid>
		<description>I clearly meant to put &quot;David Ulevitch&quot; as my name.  

Clearly low on caffeine. :-)

-david</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I clearly meant to put &#8220;David Ulevitch&#8221; as my name.  </p>
<p>Clearly low on caffeine. :-)</p>
<p>-david</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DP</title>
		<link>http://laughingsquid.com/opendns/comment-page-1/#comment-24076</link>
		<dc:creator>DP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 20:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laughingsquid.com/2006/07/18/opendns/#comment-24076</guid>
		<description>DP -- Thanks for telling us.  We&#039;re definitely improving connectivity on the east coast this week and next.  Should be a dramatic difference.

-david</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DP &#8212; Thanks for telling us.  We&#8217;re definitely improving connectivity on the east coast this week and next.  Should be a dramatic difference.</p>
<p>-david</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
