<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Generation Loss, What JPEG Compression Looks Like After 600 Saves</title>
	<atom:link href="http://laughingsquid.com/generation-loss-what-jpg-compression-looks-like-after-600-saves/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://laughingsquid.com/generation-loss-what-jpg-compression-looks-like-after-600-saves/</link>
	<description>art, culture and technology from San Francisco and beyond</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 02:11:18 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://laughingsquid.com/generation-loss-what-jpg-compression-looks-like-after-600-saves/comment-page-1/#comment-664259</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 15:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laughingsquid.com/?p=20319#comment-664259</guid>
		<description>PS: Very cool video. I should have said that first. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS: Very cool video. I should have said that first. :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://laughingsquid.com/generation-loss-what-jpg-compression-looks-like-after-600-saves/comment-page-1/#comment-664258</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 15:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laughingsquid.com/?p=20319#comment-664258</guid>
		<description>Why increase the compression every time?  (and how was that increase done 600 times??)  Test should be done at a decent compression setting, like 80%, and that setting kept for the 600 times -more realistic.  (like saving 600 times is realistic, lol).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why increase the compression every time?  (and how was that increase done 600 times??)  Test should be done at a decent compression setting, like 80%, and that setting kept for the 600 times -more realistic.  (like saving 600 times is realistic, lol).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anand</title>
		<link>http://laughingsquid.com/generation-loss-what-jpg-compression-looks-like-after-600-saves/comment-page-1/#comment-579973</link>
		<dc:creator>Anand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:34:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laughingsquid.com/?p=20319#comment-579973</guid>
		<description>Should have chosen a better image, a face probably..Barack Obama?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should have chosen a better image, a face probably..Barack Obama?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy Parkinson</title>
		<link>http://laughingsquid.com/generation-loss-what-jpg-compression-looks-like-after-600-saves/comment-page-1/#comment-579234</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy Parkinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 02:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laughingsquid.com/?p=20319#comment-579234</guid>
		<description>Reciprocal entropy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reciprocal entropy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse</title>
		<link>http://laughingsquid.com/generation-loss-what-jpg-compression-looks-like-after-600-saves/comment-page-1/#comment-578672</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 16:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laughingsquid.com/?p=20319#comment-578672</guid>
		<description>Neat, it starts looking like a Monet at one point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neat, it starts looking like a Monet at one point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vlasta</title>
		<link>http://laughingsquid.com/generation-loss-what-jpg-compression-looks-like-after-600-saves/comment-page-1/#comment-578555</link>
		<dc:creator>Vlasta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 13:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laughingsquid.com/?p=20319#comment-578555</guid>
		<description>There are ways around it... try this with RealWorld Photos editor and it will stay the same after 600 saves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are ways around it&#8230; try this with RealWorld Photos editor and it will stay the same after 600 saves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Kupietz</title>
		<link>http://laughingsquid.com/generation-loss-what-jpg-compression-looks-like-after-600-saves/comment-page-1/#comment-578400</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Kupietz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 09:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laughingsquid.com/?p=20319#comment-578400</guid>
		<description>@Robert, I understand what you&#039;re saying but the precise compression depends on the image content. There could be an image which either can be maximally compressed without loss - for instance, by your reasoning, a solid black image, because an image cannot contain any less content than that.  Or perhaps you get a cycle of images which repeats. I think an experiment is called for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Robert, I understand what you&#8217;re saying but the precise compression depends on the image content. There could be an image which either can be maximally compressed without loss &#8211; for instance, by your reasoning, a solid black image, because an image cannot contain any less content than that.  Or perhaps you get a cycle of images which repeats. I think an experiment is called for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Taylor</title>
		<link>http://laughingsquid.com/generation-loss-what-jpg-compression-looks-like-after-600-saves/comment-page-1/#comment-578220</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 04:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laughingsquid.com/?p=20319#comment-578220</guid>
		<description>@Robert Solomon.

I believe you&#039;re thinking of JPEG2000, which is wavelet based, but JPEG itself isn&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Robert Solomon.</p>
<p>I believe you&#8217;re thinking of JPEG2000, which is wavelet based, but JPEG itself isn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Solomon</title>
		<link>http://laughingsquid.com/generation-loss-what-jpg-compression-looks-like-after-600-saves/comment-page-1/#comment-578118</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Solomon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 01:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laughingsquid.com/?p=20319#comment-578118</guid>
		<description>JPEG is lossy compression; each time info is lost. Thus, it reaches a point where there is  not enough info for an image. Would not happen with lossless compression. JPEG  is a wavelet based technique based on sine waves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JPEG is lossy compression; each time info is lost. Thus, it reaches a point where there is  not enough info for an image. Would not happen with lossless compression. JPEG  is a wavelet based technique based on sine waves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Kupietz</title>
		<link>http://laughingsquid.com/generation-loss-what-jpg-compression-looks-like-after-600-saves/comment-page-1/#comment-578098</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Kupietz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 01:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laughingsquid.com/?p=20319#comment-578098</guid>
		<description>Come to think of it, I&#039;d like to see this go far beyond 600 saves... I wonder if it hits homeostasis, or the noisy result keeps changing indefinitely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come to think of it, I&#8217;d like to see this go far beyond 600 saves&#8230; I wonder if it hits homeostasis, or the noisy result keeps changing indefinitely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Kupietz</title>
		<link>http://laughingsquid.com/generation-loss-what-jpg-compression-looks-like-after-600-saves/comment-page-1/#comment-578095</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Kupietz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 01:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laughingsquid.com/?p=20319#comment-578095</guid>
		<description>Interesting, I&#039;ve been curious about this. I&#039;ve been wanting to do something similar with MP3 compression at various quality settings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting, I&#8217;ve been curious about this. I&#8217;ve been wanting to do something similar with MP3 compression at various quality settings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matsonian</title>
		<link>http://laughingsquid.com/generation-loss-what-jpg-compression-looks-like-after-600-saves/comment-page-1/#comment-578067</link>
		<dc:creator>matsonian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 00:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laughingsquid.com/?p=20319#comment-578067</guid>
		<description>Cool... if you keep staring at the final image, I swear I see Madonna on a horse wearing lederhosen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool&#8230; if you keep staring at the final image, I swear I see Madonna on a horse wearing lederhosen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
