<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flickr Launches New Video Feature</title>
	<atom:link href="http://laughingsquid.com/flickr-launches-new-video-feature/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://laughingsquid.com/flickr-launches-new-video-feature/</link>
	<description>an online resource for art, culture and technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 17:49:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Humphries</title>
		<link>http://laughingsquid.com/flickr-launches-new-video-feature/comment-page-1/#comment-525778</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Humphries</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 06:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laughingsquid.com/?p=4829#comment-525778</guid>
		<description>I think it would be even more convenient if you could upload a video right next to a photo that you take, i.e., If I have a photo in my photostream that has a video that complements that particular photo, one should be able to add that video right on the same photo page, instead of uploading videos separate from the photos, if that makes sense. 

Or just the opposite, upload a video separately and then add photos to the page where the video is, sort of like how Vimeo allows you to add photos from Flickr to each video page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it would be even more convenient if you could upload a video right next to a photo that you take, i.e., If I have a photo in my photostream that has a video that complements that particular photo, one should be able to add that video right on the same photo page, instead of uploading videos separate from the photos, if that makes sense. </p>
<p>Or just the opposite, upload a video separately and then add photos to the page where the video is, sort of like how Vimeo allows you to add photos from Flickr to each video page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enric</title>
		<link>http://laughingsquid.com/flickr-launches-new-video-feature/comment-page-1/#comment-525777</link>
		<dc:creator>Enric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 06:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laughingsquid.com/?p=4829#comment-525777</guid>
		<description>Love it, &quot;No More Chanting&quot;!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love it, &#8220;No More Chanting&#8221;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikl-em</title>
		<link>http://laughingsquid.com/flickr-launches-new-video-feature/comment-page-1/#comment-525774</link>
		<dc:creator>mikl-em</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 04:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laughingsquid.com/?p=4829#comment-525774</guid>
		<description>awesome!  at last!  

For me the answer to why Flickr needs video is that videos shot from my digital camera make sense in context of my photos.  I don&#039;t need to upload them to a video site, they belong as part of my flickr stream.  So that works for me.  So I&#039;m going to upload dozens of short videos that have been languishing on my hard drive.  awesome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>awesome!  at last!  </p>
<p>For me the answer to why Flickr needs video is that videos shot from my digital camera make sense in context of my photos.  I don&#8217;t need to upload them to a video site, they belong as part of my flickr stream.  So that works for me.  So I&#8217;m going to upload dozens of short videos that have been languishing on my hard drive.  awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Humphries</title>
		<link>http://laughingsquid.com/flickr-launches-new-video-feature/comment-page-1/#comment-525770</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Humphries</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 00:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laughingsquid.com/?p=4829#comment-525770</guid>
		<description>The big question: Why does flickr need a video feature? Flickr is to photos as YouTube is to video.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The big question: Why does flickr need a video feature? Flickr is to photos as YouTube is to video.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

