<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canon Announces PowerShot G11 Camera</title>
	<atom:link href="http://laughingsquid.com/canon-announces-powershot-g11-camera/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://laughingsquid.com/canon-announces-powershot-g11-camera/</link>
	<description>an online resource for art, culture and technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 17:49:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: salsa</title>
		<link>http://laughingsquid.com/canon-announces-powershot-g11-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-671218</link>
		<dc:creator>salsa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 20:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laughingsquid.com/?p=30805#comment-671218</guid>
		<description>Agreed that standard def video recording is soooo 2007.

With 2 more stops and a swivel screen, this might be the G unit I finally buy...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed that standard def video recording is soooo 2007.</p>
<p>With 2 more stops and a swivel screen, this might be the G unit I finally buy&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Beale</title>
		<link>http://laughingsquid.com/canon-announces-powershot-g11-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-671069</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Beale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 17:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laughingsquid.com/?p=30805#comment-671069</guid>
		<description>I agree, I wish the G series had better video.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, I wish the G series had better video.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adam jackson</title>
		<link>http://laughingsquid.com/canon-announces-powershot-g11-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-671063</link>
		<dc:creator>adam jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 17:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laughingsquid.com/?p=30805#comment-671063</guid>
		<description>I purchased the G10 about 60 days ago. I was an S5IS Owner (18x zoom, swiveling LCD) and gave up those two kick ass features for a better image processor, RAW support and higher ISO.

The G11 brings back the swivel lens which really excites me and if low-light is better, that&#039;s a huge sell for me since most photo walks are at night or events that take place in bars / clubs.

The final thing that is a downer is the price ($499 eek!) and the fact that video is still 640x480. That&#039;s what the G7, G9 &amp; G10 have. 4 generations of STandard Def when every other pro-camera is moving to 720P at least. 

I would have thought that Cannon&#039;s most expensive point &amp; shoot would get some form of High-Def even if it was crippled at 20 frames per second.

I might put mine on eBay with a reserve of $450 since it&#039;s so new and if someone buys it I&#039;ll upgrade to the G11. If not, I&#039;m happy with the G10.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I purchased the G10 about 60 days ago. I was an S5IS Owner (18x zoom, swiveling LCD) and gave up those two kick ass features for a better image processor, RAW support and higher ISO.</p>
<p>The G11 brings back the swivel lens which really excites me and if low-light is better, that&#8217;s a huge sell for me since most photo walks are at night or events that take place in bars / clubs.</p>
<p>The final thing that is a downer is the price ($499 eek!) and the fact that video is still 640&#215;480. That&#8217;s what the G7, G9 &amp; G10 have. 4 generations of STandard Def when every other pro-camera is moving to 720P at least. </p>
<p>I would have thought that Cannon&#8217;s most expensive point &amp; shoot would get some form of High-Def even if it was crippled at 20 frames per second.</p>
<p>I might put mine on eBay with a reserve of $450 since it&#8217;s so new and if someone buys it I&#8217;ll upgrade to the G11. If not, I&#8217;m happy with the G10.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laszlo Thoth</title>
		<link>http://laughingsquid.com/canon-announces-powershot-g11-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-671054</link>
		<dc:creator>Laszlo Thoth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 17:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laughingsquid.com/?p=30805#comment-671054</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m more excited about the new S20. It&#039;s quite a bit more compact but it&#039;s still got a fast F2.0 lens, lots of manual controls, shoots raw, etc. It seems to be something like a G11 in an IXUS body.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m more excited about the new S20. It&#8217;s quite a bit more compact but it&#8217;s still got a fast F2.0 lens, lots of manual controls, shoots raw, etc. It seems to be something like a G11 in an IXUS body.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raoul</title>
		<link>http://laughingsquid.com/canon-announces-powershot-g11-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-671040</link>
		<dc:creator>Raoul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 16:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laughingsquid.com/?p=30805#comment-671040</guid>
		<description>It&#039;ll be interesting to see how the new sensor works in real world situations. A bit disappointed with the setback in resolution (14.7 in the G10 vs. 10 in the G11), but if it helps the camera deliver better images in low light, that&#039;s good. 

Would love to see the G series give me the full 240 dpi resolution that Canon&#039;s DSLRs give me. Right now the G10 gives me 180 dpi, which is better than the 72 dpi of most digital cameras, but it could be better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;ll be interesting to see how the new sensor works in real world situations. A bit disappointed with the setback in resolution (14.7 in the G10 vs. 10 in the G11), but if it helps the camera deliver better images in low light, that&#8217;s good. </p>
<p>Would love to see the G series give me the full 240 dpi resolution that Canon&#8217;s DSLRs give me. Right now the G10 gives me 180 dpi, which is better than the 72 dpi of most digital cameras, but it could be better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

